Showing posts with label Truth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Truth. Show all posts

Monday, October 21, 2013

What is the Pillar and Foundation of Truth?


[A GRAMBUS post.]
Jesus IS Truth!  But, How Do We Know His Truth Today?

Opening Session of Vatican II
I have a friend who keeps debating me on the validity of Sola Scriptura—the position held by non-Catholic Christians, that the Bible Alone is the source of Truth for Christians.  Whereas, Catholics claim that the Truth of Christ was revealed all the way up to the death of the last Apostle, and the Apostles’ teachings were carried on through Sacred Tradition. Sacred Tradition includes the written Word—Holy Scriptures/the Bible, as well as Tradition passed down orally.  The Jews very carefully preserved their Oral Tradition, which helped give support to the interpretation of the Holy Scriptures in the Old Testament.  The same is true after Christ!

Furthermore, non-Catholic Christians sometimes forget how the Bible came to be.  Historically, the Bible wasn't even in existence until the Roman Church Council of Nicaea in 325.  The books of the Bible were not gathered into one place even until then.  There were hundreds of letters floating around, and the Council had to assess which were reliable as authentic sources, worthy of placing within a Holy Canon of “New Testament” Scriptures.  The 73 (Old and New Testament) books chosen by the Council of Nicaea happen to be the same books that are in the Catholic Bible today.  After 1,500 years of the Scriptures’ guidance in the Church, the Reformation of 1534 instigated the removal of 7 of those books from the Canon.  (But for you real history buffs), …even though Luther’s excommunication was is 1521, Luther’s translation of the Bible in 1539 still contained all 73 books.  (I know.  Stan and I held it in our hands at the Newberry Research Library in Chicago.) It wasn’t until the 1800’s that Protestant publishers finally changed the Canon by removing 7 of the books.  On whose authority, I don’t know.

Now, whether the original 73 or the secondary choice of 66, ALL Christians hold these Scriptures to be the infallible Word of God, …and they are!  But, most Christians are NOT aware that they have the Roman Catholic Church (under the leadership of the Holy Spirit) to thank for the very existence of the Holy Scriptures they hold so dear.   If all Christians were aware, maybe they would also believe the Church’s claims that She is the Church Christ said the Holy Spirit would lead into ALL Truth.

The Bible is just one piece of that Truth, but a very important piece. When unfortunately, in the 1500s (1521 ff) some split from the Roman Church during the Reformation, the Bible was the only Truth those who left could tangibly take with them.  Though fortunately, SOME of the Roman Church’s doctrines WERE kept, even though they are not FOUND in the Scriptures—like the Doctrine of the Holy Trinity and the Doctrine of Christ’s Nature being totally human, and (at the same time) totally divine. Those are Truths the Original Church was lead into by the Holy Spirit.  I’m so glad to say that in matters of Faith and Morals, the Church has stood strong against heresies and cultural pressures (ie. Pressure in modern times to accept contraceptive methods.)

So, my second point is that Truth needs more than just a book (of 66 or 73 books) of writings.  Truth needs an infallible body to interpret and proclaim right doctrines from those writings that are based on the Mind of Christ through the leading of the Holy Spirit. 

Truth is not determined with just the Bible, the Holy Spirit, and you, as Stan and I used to think.  That’s how over 33,000 different denominations of churches have been started.  Stan and I thought we knew it all.  We had studied the Bible, memorized it, and formed our own opinions on what it all meant.  Yet, it was next to impossible to find a church that agreed with us 100%.  Once Stan and I realized it was not about US finding a church that agreed with OUR interpretation, but about God founding a Church, that He had promised to be lead into ALL Truth by the Holy Spirit, we suddenly realized we had things backwards.  That’s when we stopped church hopping and started trying to line ourselves up with that One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.  And that has made all the difference.  We are now ready to give our lives for that Church, because Christ founded Her and kept His promises all the way through Her gnarled history up to the present day.  She has not been perfect in Her people or in Her practices.  She and her members have needed reform and received it—a little later than the Protestant Reformers would have liked.  But, Her doctrines have never changed.  And, Christ will never abandon Her, because His promise is true that the gates of hell will not prevail against His Holy Church and that He will never leave Her nor forsake Her.  She continues to grow and to promote infallible Truth in matters of Faith and Morals. 

In conclusion, I'd like to quote a hymn that is familiar to ALL Christians:
v1.  The Church's one foundation is Jesus Christ Her Lord.
She is His new creation* through water and the Word.
From heaven He came and sought Her to be His Holy Bride.
With His own blood He bought Her.  And, for Her life He died.
*[The Church was founded/created by Christ.]

v2.  Elect from every nation, yet one o'er all the earth,
Her charter of salvation, One Lord, one faith, one birth.
One holy name She blesses.  Partakes one holy food.*
And to one hope She presses.  With every grace endued.
*[The Holy Eucharist]

v4.  Yet She on earth hath union, with God, the Three in One.
And mystic sweet communion* with those whose rest is won.
O happy ones and holy!  Lord, give us grace that we.
Like them, the meek and lowly, on high may dwell with thee.
*[Communion of Saints]

BTW, according to I Timothy 3:15, the Pillar and Foundation of Truth, …is the Church...  (not the Bible).

Sunday, January 30, 2011

Ralph McInerny and the Wisdom of Fiction

From Daniel McInerny at his blog HIGH CONCEPTS a eulogy of this prolific father, Ralph McInerny, perhaps the most prolific Catholic author of fiction, non-fiction, and philosophy of the last few hundred years.  Click HERE for the entire post at Daniel's blog.

=======

In Dante and the Blessed Virgin my father articulates a truth that served as one of the most formative principles of his life as both philosopher and writer of fiction. That truth concerns what he follows Aristotle in calling “poetry,” Aristotle’s name for the genus of storytelling, of fiction. About storytelling, my father says this in Dante and the Blessed Virgin:
We become involved in stories because their characters are in some way ourselves. They are our better or worse selves, but not too much the one way or the other. We follow an imagined version of the choices that make up any human life, choices that matter. We are what we do, and characters in a story reveal who they are by their actions and choices. In real life, bounders succeed and the innocent suffer; they do in fiction, too, but the story makes sense of that in a way real life never does. Any story worth reading again will tell us something about the human condition we recognize as true” (21).
Read entire post.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

An Open Letter to Christian Publishers and Producers about ENTERTAINMENT

Dear Christian writers, producers, publishers, artists, and other talent with a message to get out.


INSPIRE OR EXPIRE

As a producer, publisher and distributor of media products I am constantly approached by authors, artists and their representatives to assist them in either producing, publishing or distributing their products.

In the last few days I have been approached by five of these well-meaning individuals. One wanted me to make a movie about his idea, another wanted me to sell her music CD, a publisher wanted me to sell their book, and two others wanted me to produce videos to compliment their books. I have turned down all. One reason is that I have limited resources and cannot be engaged with everything that comes my way. But most of the time the idea is not good enough to engage customers so that the effort will turn a profit—a necessary "evil" in order to create jobs, support human dignity, and fund charitable efforts.

The books that I received for review have "inspired" me to write this blog. "Inspired" is in quotes because although the topics of the three books meet fundamental needs in society and are well-written they are emotionally (visually) unappealing. Yet, all three books supposedly target the lay reader or general public. Two of the three have attractive covers. But as soon as the books are cracked we are inundated with dry, long, explanations that only philosophers and theologians might appreciate.  They are void of visual appeal and emotional engagement. In short there is no entertainment value. 

It is very sad and frustrating to come upon great ideas (such as these books represent) that are so poorly executed by their publishers. You must be both inspired in the creation of your works (products) and you must also inspire the products use. If you don't, your efforts and your work will expire without effect. 

DESIGN TO EMOTIONALIZE

Something needs to be said about the state of most religious products that are "designed" to educate. They don't. Well meaning intentions are not sufficient, just like prayer is no substitute for talent or effort. As a Christian, in addition to inspiration (from the Holy Spirit or otherwise), you need both talent (natural or acquired) and effort (passion plus perseverance) to accomplish something good. Prayer alone results only in religious mediocrity. The mind must partner with the body -- the spiritual and psychological must be fully engaged with the physical realm. The WHOLE person must be involved in creating the product and in using the product.  Anything less is just that -- less.

Now in religious circles (especially orthodox Catholic and Christian circles) the term "entertainment" is nearly an anathema. There is this connotation that anything that entertains is probably evil. Well, folks, get over that misconception. You need to understand what "entertainment" is really about at both the cognitive and subconscious levels. Yes, it can be mindless enjoyment or escape. But  remember this when you're thinking that, the "mindless" fun WILL BE REMEMBERED FOR A LIFETIME.

Does that give you a hint at what you may be missing as a communicator and educator of ideas? You want people to remember things (and perhaps practice those things) for a lifetime.  To do that you need to create an adrenalin rush that burns your brain's synapses in a pattern that allows later recall. Without that emotional participation of the body, your audience will never remember a thing.

A simple way of explaining that is this: The user MUST first BE INTERESTED in the product for purposes of achieving a PERSONAL GOAL. In all successful stories the protagonist must have a physical goal or the story is lost on the audience. (TMP.) That is also true of our personal stories, our lives. People without goals becomes useless if not dangerous to society.  In our publications and mass media efforts such a goal related interest must be evident to the reader on the surface of a product for a person to even consider it. But it must run much deeper for them to buy it and continually use it and not let it sit on the shelf.  Below is a slide from one of my workshops. It's the Alison Fisher Purchase Funnel. We use it in story structure to explain romantic comedies. But it was conceived to help marketers and producers understand the buyer's perspective of the purchasing process.


For many marketers just the exchange of money for product is the producer's main goal. Whether they use the product is of a lesser concern. But for religious educators the physical purchase is not nearly as important as the internal application. So, if you're selling a book that you hope will change how a person relates to their spouse, you will not be satisfied unless a changed life results. Actual acquisition of the book is only one step to your end goal. So for religious publishers the "PURCHASE" in the funnel above has a deeper meaning. "Buyer commitment" means use and application.

What is instructive about the funnel for a creator of products is that the deeper you drill down into the funnel, the more emotionally involved you need the buyer to be. And I'm suggesting that emotional involvement means "entertainment value" and that means "SENSUAL."

SENSUALIZE

"Sensual" -- ah, another anathema term in Christian publishing. Well, let me properly (not popularly) define it for you.  Human beings are fundamentally sentient beings. "Sentience" is the ability to feel or perceive. We do that through our senses. Can you name all SIX of them. Yes, humans have SIX physical senses. The more of them you employ in your products as a communicator, the better you will communicate -- especially with men who need both ears and both eyes to connect their left and right brains. (That was not a slam, it's true.)  Okay, what are the SIX senses: Seeing, Hearing, Feeling, Smelling, Tasting .... and Balancing (most of us have an inner ear that allows us to stand, sit, walk and climb.) It's important to include this kinesthetic sense (which includes not just the inner-ear but the thousands of nerve endings that control our muscles to orient our body in space) because it is that ACTIVE sense which allows us to physically participate and do the good works God calls us to. It's also a lot harder to fall asleep when you're walking, running or jumping -- although I manage to have nearly perfected it as of late.

In real life all those senses are used, which is why "experience" is the best teacher. I like movies a lot because they involve many of the senses all at once, and can come close to simulating real life. In the Catholic Mass, Communion is the ultimate communication method. It requires the use of all six senses. Books create a special challenge because they are mostly passive. (The iPad and its derivatives are changing that.) But how does a book entertain, or emotionally engage? Here is a shorthanded list of what a good book can do to emotionally engage the reader:

1. Content - Relevant, Readable, Witty
2. Visuals - Bold, Colorful, Frequent
3. Layout - Logical, Varied, Spaced
4. Typography - Structured, Variety, Characterized
5. Binding - Secure, Easy, Protective

So, with that long introduction, to further reinforce my point, below is a cross-posting from my Moral Premise Blog titled FIRST ENTERTAIN. Does this apply to you?

===========================

FIRST ENTERTAIN

There's an adage in Hollywood, and similar industries, that says: "FIRST ENTERTAIN."

Successful entertainment, to me, is defined as emotionally engaging audiences so that they're willing to buy a ticket.

For me, the term "entertain" has an emotional element and a training element. (I'm sure this is NOT the word's etymology, but humor me.) Successful entertainment always emotionally engages your audience, AND it passes onto them some true moral message usually hidden in the subtext.  (For the girl on the right that truth is "Never, ever believe your mom when she says, 'Trust me, you'll love it.'")

So, we have something that is emotional (E) and we have a training element (TRAIN). That gives us E-TRAIN. Also there is the idea that both the emotional and the training enter into the person's consciousness and become ingrained. The key word there is ENTER.

So successful entertainment ENTERS into a person EMOTIONALLY and TRAINS them about something true. First ENTERTAIN.

Okay, Okay, so TRAIN and TAIN are not the same. Let me  s t r e t c h  it for ya. TAIN rhymes with STAIN, and good entertainment leaves behind a stain.... no, no, you potty head... a stain in your brain—a memory. (Geez! I can't take you anywhere.) Another way to understand it is that ENTER-TAIN is a lot like INNER-TRAIN. That is, something is "entertaining" because it has the ability to train our memories. The reverse is also true: if we want to train our memories there must be some emotional involvement, some entertainment. Memories do not "stick" without adrenalin burning some synapses together in our brain.  


The long of this short post is that successful communication has three components. It must ENTERTAIN, and for it to do that it must be MORALLY TRUE (at a psychological, spiritual, or subliminal level), and it must EMOTIONALLY ENGAGE (it must be be a visceral simulation of life).

That is what stories do better than a thrill ride at an amusement park, and what stories do almost as good as real life experiences (life's best teacher), but with out the physical danger.

(And you can believe the little girl above would feel a lot safer at the movies. Real life does have its drawbacks, especially when your mother is C R A Z Y!)

Thursday, November 15, 2001

J.R.R. TOLKIEN´S TAKE ON THE TRUTH

An Interview with Author Joseph Pearce
on "Lord of the Rings"

NEW YORK, NOV. 15, 2001 (Zenit.org).- Catholic convert Joseph Pearce is author of two popular books on J.R.R. Tolkien, "Tolkien: Man and Myth" and "Tolkien: A Celebration" (both Ignatius Press).

With the film release of "Lord of the Rings" scheduled for next month, Pearce mused about Tolkien (1892-1973) and his work in this interview with ZENIT.

Q: There have been criticisms of some fantasy stories because of their allegedly pagan orientation. Do you see Tolkien´s works as being part of this genre or is it different?
Pearce: Tolkien spoke of myths and fairy stories, rather than "fantasy." He was a lifelong practicing, and very devout, Catholic who believed that mythology was a means of conveying certain transcendent truths which are almost inexpressible within the factual confines of a "realistic" novel.

In order to understand Tolkien´s "philosophy of myth" it is useful to commence with a maxim of G.K. Chesterton: "not facts first, truth first." Tolkien and Chesterton were both intent on differentiating between facts, which are purely physical, and truth, which is metaphysical.

Thus a myth or a fairy story can convey love and hate, selfishness and self-sacrifice, loyalty and betrayal, good and evil -- all of which are metaphysical realities, that is, true, even if conveyed in a mythological or fairyland setting.

There is no need for Christians to worry about the role of "story" as a conveyer of truth. After all, Christ was the greatest storyteller of all. His parables might not be factual but they are always truthful.

Take, for instance, the parable of the prodigal son. Probably, Christ was not referring to one particular son, nor one particular forgiving father, nor one particular envious brother. The power of the story does not reside in its being factual but in its being truthful.

It doesn´t matter that the prodigal son might never have existed as an actual person; he exists in each of us. We are all, at one time or another, a prodigal son, a forgiving father or an envious brother. It is "applicable" to all of us. It is the story´s truth, not its facts, that matter.

This was Tolkien´s point. Furthermore, there is more truth in "The Lord of the Rings" than in many examples of fictional realism.

Q: In recent years, magic in diverse forms such as games, TV shows, etc., has been very popular among young people. Given the way magical powers are presented in the "Lord of the Rings," do you think that there could be any dangers for youngsters?

Pearce: There is very little of what could be termed magic in "The Lord of the Rings." There is much that is supernatural, but only in the sense that God is supernatural, or that Satan is supernatural, or that good and evil are supernatural.

It would be more accurate to describe the so-called magic in "The Lord of the Rings" as miraculous, when it serves the good, and demonic, when it serves the evil.

Tolkien´s Middle-Earth, the world in which "The Lord of the Rings" is set, is under the ultimate power of the One God. It is also under the corrupting influence of Melkor, the fallen angel who is Tolkien´s Satan.

The greatest of Satan´s servants, Sauron, is the Dark Lord who is the enemy in "The Lord of the Rings." In other words The Fellowship of the Ring is in a fight to the finish with Satan´s servants.

How can Christians possibly object to a quest, the purpose of which is to thwart the evil designs of the demonic enemy? Far from being a "fantasy," "The Lord of the Rings" is a theological thriller.

Q: Do you think this was Tolkien´s intention?

Pearce: There is no doubt that "The Lord of the Rings" is a profoundly Christian myth, but that is not the same as saying that it is an allegory.

Tolkien disliked allegory because he saw it as a rather crude literary form. In an allegory, the writer begins with the point he wishes to make and then makes up a story to make his point. The story is really little more than a means of illustrating the moral.

Tolkien believed that a myth should not be allegorical but that it should be "applicable." In other words, the truth that emerges in the story can be applied to the truth that emerges in life.

There is, therefore, a good deal of truth in "The Lord of the Rings" even though its author never set out intentionally to introduce it allegorically. This is, perhaps, a subtle distinction but one which Tolkien believed was important.

Q: What values do you think "The Lord of the Rings" has to teach us?

Pearce: The values that emerge in "The Lord of the Rings" are the values that emerge in the Gospels.

In the characterization of the Hobbits, the most reluctant and the most unlikely of heroes, we see the exaltation of the humble. In the figure of Gandalf we see the archetype of an Old Testament patriarch, his staff apparently having the same power as that possessed by Moses.

In his apparent "death" and "resurrection" we see him emerge as a Christ-like figure. His "resurrection" results in his transfiguration.

Before he laid down his life for his friends he was Gandalf the Grey; afterward, he becomes Gandalf the White. He is washed white in the purity of his self-sacrifice and emerges more powerful in virtue than ever.

The character of Gollum is debased by his attachment to the Ring, the symbol of the sin of pride. The possessor of the Ring is possessed by his possession and, in consequence, is dispossessed of his soul. The wearer of the Ring always becomes invisible to those that are good but at the same time becomes more visible to the eyes of evil.

Thus we see that the sinner excommunicates himself from the society of the good and enters Satan´s world.

Ultimately, the bearing of the Ring by Frodo, and his heroic struggle to resist the temptation to succumb to its evil powers, is akin to the Carrying of the Cross, the supreme act of selflessness.

Throughout the whole of "The Lord of the Rings" the forces of evil are seen as powerful but not all-powerful. There is always the sense that divine providence is on the side of the Fellowship and that, ultimately, it will prevail against all the odds. As Tolkien put it succinctly, "Above all shadows rides the Sun."

Q: Many lament the depravity in the mass media today. What can we learn from Tolkien about improving the quality of entertainment?

Pearce: The greatest lesson we learn from Tolkien is the objective nature of truth. Evil is real; and so is good.

Goodness is the real presence of God; evil is his real absence. Tolkien has no time for the amoral relativism that is so prevalent in much of what passes as modern entertainment.

The fact that Tolkien´s myth contains more truth than most of what passes as realism serves as a damning indictment of the false vision being presented by today´s mass media.

ZE01111520