Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Christian Priorities - Scandal

This is not unique to Catholicism, bu it still bugs me. The Sunday before the Superbowl these two easels with their signs showed up in the lobby of our parish.
This comparison of the attention given to spiritual matters, vs. leisure matters within the Church, by Church leaders, is repulsive. It is a great example of why pagans don't take Christianity seriously. The biggest reason for not becoming Catholic, is not what the faith teaches, but simply the priorities demonstrated by other Catholics. This is also true of Christians in so many other denominations.  While there are many examples of pure evil and hatred toward the things of God and Christ, a good deal of the spite is self-induced. These signs remained in the lobby of our parish for two weeks. They stood only feet apart. Yet the difference in their presentation was miles apart and created a scandal.

Being in the media business I know that presentation matters. The presentation (per se) becomes a unavoidable metaphor. The presentation is the non-verbal that communicates the intended value and attitude of the presenter.  These posters clearly indicate to all that see them that football and parties are much more important to this congregation than studying about the faith through the Life in the Spirit Seminars.


Thursday, March 24, 2011

In Memory of Lauren Myers

A VALIANT, BRAVE, AND GRACEFUL SOUL
Lauren Myers (1948-2011) 


 Many of you will remember LAUREN MYERS, the Episcopalian Bible instructor who graced the table with Alex Jones, Steve Ray and others for our recording of 
A DINNER WITH ALEX JONES as part of the NO PRICE TOO HIGH DVD and television special that has been seen on EWTN, CatholicTV, The Miracle Channel, and other networks, many times over the past years. Lauren left for heaven yesterday, with her family at her side, after an 11 year battle with cancer.

We asked Lauren to participate in our dinner recording because of the gracious and intelligent bridge she represented between Catholicism and Protestantism. Her stage presence was always confident and pleasant. And who can forget her wonderful British brogue that always raised the bar for the rest of us pretending to be diplomats. She was our role model.  Here are a few words from her husband and my friend, Garrett.

After a valiant, brave and graceful eleven year battle with cancer, Lauren slipped away painlessly this morning with daughter Kate, son Nick, daughter-in-law Ashley, our priest and friend Steve Kelly, our dog Scooter and me by her side. Lauren was a remarkable woman.

I was so fortunate to spend 28 years with her,  raise a terrific family together and create so many friendships and memories. Lauren got to meet and spend time with our first grandson Matthew these last few weeks before she passed on, which was a great joy and blessing for her.

Lauren faced her long cancer battle as she faced everything, with grace, courage, intellect and complete faith in the Lord. She was always more concerned about other people's welfare and comfort than her own regardless of her suffering.

We will have a viewing for Lauren on Friday the 25th and a glorious funeral to celebrate Lauren's life on Saturday.  The viewing will be from 3 to 8 PM at AH Peters funeral home at Vernier and Mack Ave in Grosse Pointe, MI. There will be an obituary for Lauren on the funeral home site at: http://ahpeters.com/

The funeral will be at St. John's Episcopal Church in Detroit  on Saturday, 26 March at 11 AM. St. John's is near Comerica Park at Woodward and the Fisher expressway. There is free parking in the parking lot behind the church.  

Sometime in the coming weeks, I'll be going to England to hold a memorial service for Lauren with her family and friends there. 

We have been aware of and fully appreciate our friends' and families' prayers and support for Lauren, myself and our family through these difficult times.

Thank you. Garrett Myers

Garrett has remarked from time-to-time how people have told him they saw Lauren on TV. Yesterday he remarked about how she is somehow memorialized in the program.  She was at her best that night...even though we didn't finished shooting until after midnight.


Unaware that she was passing at that very hour I was entering her name in Internet Movie Database (IMDB.com) as a member of the television cast of the program. I don't think that was coincidental.

Pray for us Lauren. We'll miss you... but we'll see you "later," God willing. 

Stanley D. Williams, Ph.D.
Nineveh's Crossing 

Here's the Obituary:

Lauren Gillian Myers, March 23, 2011 age 62

Lauren, wife of Garrett Myers, the only child of Colonel Anthony G.T. and Patricia Shave, died at home surrounded by her loving family, having courageously survived eleven years with breast cancer.

Lauren was a British citizen and lived in England, Germany, Malaysia and France before moving to the United States with her husband Garrett in 1982. Earlier, she worked in London as managing director of a London-based international public relations firm and then at the military electronic firm Racal Decca.

Lauren was a dedicated mother, devoted Christian, wonderful cook and consummate artist—sewing, drawing, crocheting, knitting, singing and writing. She was also passionately committed to her chosen charities.

As an involved parishioner at Christ Church Grosse Pointe and Saint John's Episcopal Church in Detroit, she completed the Bible Study Fellowship program twice, taught classes and served as an Alpha Program leader. She was a member of the Daughters of the King Fellowship and Episcopal Church Women.

Extended family and friends will fondly remember Lauren for her remarkable love and compassion, intellect, grace and poise. She is survived by her husband of twenty-eight years, Garrett, children Kate, Nick (Ashley), stepchildren Jeff (Kim), and Andy (Christine), and her grandchildren Matthew, Adam, Aaron and Alex. Lauren is also survived by her parents Anthony and Patricia Shave of Surrey, England.

Visitation will take place at A.H. Peters Funeral Home in Grosse Pointe Woods on Friday, 25 March 2011 from 3:00-8:00. A funeral mass will be held at St. John's Episcopal Church on Woodward and the Fisher Expressway on Saturday 26 March 2011 at 11:00 AM.

In Lauren's memory, donations can be made to Local Motion Green in Grosse Pointe (http://www.localmotiongreen.org/) to support their mission of making information available on avoiding cancer causing substances and/or St. John's Episcopal Church.

Saturday, March 19, 2011

THE HUMAN EXPERIENCE - finally

Grassroots Films
THE HUMAN EXPERIENCE
Now Available at Nineveh's Crossing
90min. DVD documentary + extras.
We've waited years for this to be released... and now we can sell it. I had a small part in it's creation, having traveled to St. Francis house for a couple days, watching an early edit, doing some (Moral Premise) story consulting with Joe, Charles, and Mike (and they took my advice....good story arc, guys, it works), and providing the footage of India that you'll see in the film. 

The Human Experience will provide generations with something to talk about... the meaning of life and suffering. This is a great DVD to buy for people, or show to people, who  have experienced suffering or tragedy in their lives. Joe and Charles, Mike and the other guys have made their mark on the world with their break-through FISHERS OF MEN (we still sell a lot of those DVD's as well), And now this, a feature length adventure, has truly established them as cultural influencers.  High Praise for their foresight, dedication, perseverance, and proclamation of truth. Keep it up, fellas.

BTW: I still remember fondly the meals I shared with you guys on the picnic tables next to the St. Francis ballpark. Glad to see the picnic tables and the "ballpark" in the film, as well. Com'on Jeff, let him pitch.  (Stan Williams)




In a world fraught with hostility and violence, an altruistic group of young men endeavor to understand the true essence of the human spirit by visiting forgotten souls such as homeless New Yorkers, Peruvian orphans and isolated Ghanaian lepers. By spotlighting heart warming stories from around the world, this uplifting documentary shows viewers that every single person, no matter his or her lot in life, is beautiful.



Incorporates insightful commentary from: Anna Halpine, Dr. William Hurlbut, Rabbi Simon Jacobson, Dr. Alveda King, Rev. Richard Neuhaus.

Through word of mouth, The Human Experience has been viewed by more than 100,000 people at over 250 screenings in 115 cities worldwide. With standing ovations as the norm and sold out shows at select Harkin's Theatres, the film has won over 30 film festival awards and accolades.


HE Banner Montage 

   

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Al Jacquez

I'm writing the business plan to a movie titled A DAUGHTER'S HOPE. It's the theatrical version to the effort a couple years ago we called TIGER'S HOPE. In the fall of 2009 we were a month from principal photography when our funding was pulled and we shut down. Now we're getting ready to try again. In the process I was editing into the BP bios for some of the key personnel. One is AL JACQUEZ who hopefully will play the husband of our protagonist. In the movie, as in real life, JAKE is sort of a rock star that never got the recognition he still deserves.

Al was the lead vocal for SAVAGE GRACE that years ago opened for the likes of Jimi Hendrix, Three Dog Night, The Who, Rod Stewart, Jethro Tull, Credence Clearwater Revival, John Sebastian, The Allmann Brothers, Grand Funk and others. 

His current band is MEASURED CHAOS (Blues, Soul, and Rock 'n Roll). We've caught several of their shows locally and really like the music and Al out front. Last year, out in L.A., they shot a music video for one of my favorite tunes titled LIVIN' THE DREAM. Here's the embedded Youtube link. If it hangs up playing, double click on the picture and you'll get better "reception" directly on YouTube. 



Check out SAVAGE GRACE's album "ONE NIGHT IN AMERICA" on iTunes. Al sings lead on most of the cuts.  The "COMIN' HOME" cut is a song about love for a woman and love of/for Jesus. That's Al belting it out. 
 
Al attends Northridge church in Plymouth, MI and often gets to sing during their extravaganzas. This next video is from their Christmas program a few years back. It's JOY TO THE WORLD.

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Horrific Deaths Bring Meaning to Work


HORRIFIC DEATHS OF SVQUEST CREW BRING MEANING TO OUR WORK AT NINEVEH'S CROSSING 

(L to svquest crew smallR) Scott and Jean Adam are dead along with their crew Phyllis Macay and Bob Riggle, murdered by their Somalian pirates. The U.S. Navy captured 15 of the pirates and 4 four others. 

The meaning of that headline on FoxNews this morning was significant for me and the Church. I had connected to him (at a distance) because they were involved in four of my passions: Sailing, International Evangelization, Pacifica, and Scott's connection to media.  

svquestThe Adams where Catholic lay missionaries, who, in retirement decided to sail around the world and to give their trip extra meaning they filled their 57-foot pilot house sloop (SV QUEST) with hundreds of Bibles as extra ballast and delivered them to hard to reach places.   Their extensive SVQUEST adventure website is here. 

I have long dreamed of traveling to Pacifica and following the sea-track of my missionary ancestor from the London Missionary Society, John Williams.John Williams on deck  And the sail boat we purchased ten years ago was selected because it could take us there. My ancestor, John Williams, was one of the first western missionaries to the South Pacific. It was John Williams who introduced much of Pacifica to Christianity and the Bible. He was martyred on the beach of Erromanga, Dillion's Bay, New Hebrides, Nov 20, 1839.  (New Hebrides was the colonial name for an island group in the South Pacific that now forms the nation of Vanuatu.) Scott and Jean were martyred for what they did, just like John Williams, and indeed there were political ramifications in both killings.  

The Lost Angles Times reports they were active parishioners at St. Monica Catholic Church. Their love for the Bible and film (Scott was involved in television production) was probably behind one of Scott's decisions to enroll at Fuller Theological Seminary where two of my academic-film acquaintances were his professors - Dr. Robert Johnson and Dr. Craig Detweiler who were quoted in an CNN article this morning 

When they were first kidnapped (adult-napped would be a better term) I thought wouldn't it be glorious if their boat got to the Somalia coast, and their Bibles were unloaded and distributed. And what if because of that they were killed, but the nation of Somalia was brought to Christianity... just like what happened to John Williams. Now there's a story. Time will tell. Certainly when St. Paul was shipwrecked on Malta the island, to this day, is significantly Christian, and Catholic I understand.

OUR INTERNATIONAL MISSION

SAT-7We have long been engaged in shipping Nineveh's Crossing product throughout the world. We have distributors of some of our  product in Ireland, Australia, Singapore, and Malaysia. We have shipped individual product to pastors and lay people in those countries plus throughout the U.K. and Europe, and to South Africa, a few Arabian countries, and of course Mexico and Canada.  

CG Bundle

We have also been thrilled to see our programs aired internationally on networks like TBN and EWTN. But today, we agreed to yet another milestone. We are shipping the digital masters to our best selling product COMMON GROUND: What Protestants and Catholics Can Learn From Each Other to SAT-7, the Cyprus based television network where they will translate the program and broadcast it into the Mid-East countries in Arabic, Farsi, And Turkish.  So, please pray for them as they do that, that they get a good Catholic theologian to oversee the work.  

sat dishes balconiesThe great thing about satellite is that it's harder for government s to cut them off.   Millions of satellite dishes cover apartment buildings. 

Thank you for your prayers and support in buying our product. We do not get donations, so product sales is how we support the work.  


Blessings.  

Stan Williams
Nineveh's Crossing logo 





Wednesday, February 16, 2011

God, Science, Creation and Liberals

On a Fox News Article about bias against Christians at UC DAVIS, we find this argument in the com box. It is the classic "Watchmaker" argument, but wonderfully updated. It'd be a wonderful text to memorize.

Joseph 'the-alien' King  12 minutes ago
Regarding God and Science:

"Science" is the interpretation of God; this is why it always falls short of the proverbial mark. Within the jurisdiction of science, we have to update analytical theories all the time; conversely, with God, there is no updating, modification, or tweaking -- for obvious reasons. Science KNOWS that God is there; it's just too RETARDED and POMPOUS to admit it. Mathematically, everyone knows that God exists because it is programmed into us, literally! We are all unanimous in accepting the notion that a Microsoft Windows Operating System cannot magically materialize out of NOTHING; the probability is far beyond the parameters of logical acceptance. Well, science knows that the human body contains trillions of cells; moreover, the profoundness of this resides within the fact that just ONE of those trillions of cells contains more information than in an entire Microsoft Windows Operating System. If science fervently asserts that a Microsoft Windows Operating System cannot randomly - and magically - manifest out of nowhere, why is the hand of God so farcical? Furthermore, because science propagates the notion that we are all here because of chance, it must be true, as well, that a Playstation 3 can endure the same earthly, magical, chance-based manifestation. This is, of course, NOT TRUE because we all know that something as 'complex' as a Playstation 3 and Windows OS has one cardinal attribute in common: a CREATOR. To put this into further perspective, it is impossible for a single can of PEPSI -- as it is, with the text, logos, and all -- to magically materialize out of NOWHERE, and science knows this, just as well as all of us here. Well, with this information, it would be the dumbest characterization in history to assert that life is the most complex thing and then declare that it occurs by chance, at the same time -- while, also affirming that the Mona Lisa painting could never perform a random manifestation by chance. Well, ultimately, it's because science KNOWS that God exists, but most *scientists* and self-designated "intellectuals" are far too shortsighted, myopic, and blatantly arrogant to feel as if there is a superior, superlative intelligence at the helm of all things. They have a fervid, unfettering disdain for God because of pride and anger. They're proud because they want to maneuver within the likeness of God; they're angry because *all attempts* to encompass and replicate God's ubiquity, capacity, and omnipotence are met with perpetual, epic FAILURE.

Sunday, January 30, 2011

Ralph McInerny and the Wisdom of Fiction

From Daniel McInerny at his blog HIGH CONCEPTS a eulogy of this prolific father, Ralph McInerny, perhaps the most prolific Catholic author of fiction, non-fiction, and philosophy of the last few hundred years.  Click HERE for the entire post at Daniel's blog.

=======

In Dante and the Blessed Virgin my father articulates a truth that served as one of the most formative principles of his life as both philosopher and writer of fiction. That truth concerns what he follows Aristotle in calling “poetry,” Aristotle’s name for the genus of storytelling, of fiction. About storytelling, my father says this in Dante and the Blessed Virgin:
We become involved in stories because their characters are in some way ourselves. They are our better or worse selves, but not too much the one way or the other. We follow an imagined version of the choices that make up any human life, choices that matter. We are what we do, and characters in a story reveal who they are by their actions and choices. In real life, bounders succeed and the innocent suffer; they do in fiction, too, but the story makes sense of that in a way real life never does. Any story worth reading again will tell us something about the human condition we recognize as true” (21).
Read entire post.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

An Open Letter to Christian Publishers and Producers about ENTERTAINMENT

Dear Christian writers, producers, publishers, artists, and other talent with a message to get out.


INSPIRE OR EXPIRE

As a producer, publisher and distributor of media products I am constantly approached by authors, artists and their representatives to assist them in either producing, publishing or distributing their products.

In the last few days I have been approached by five of these well-meaning individuals. One wanted me to make a movie about his idea, another wanted me to sell her music CD, a publisher wanted me to sell their book, and two others wanted me to produce videos to compliment their books. I have turned down all. One reason is that I have limited resources and cannot be engaged with everything that comes my way. But most of the time the idea is not good enough to engage customers so that the effort will turn a profit—a necessary "evil" in order to create jobs, support human dignity, and fund charitable efforts.

The books that I received for review have "inspired" me to write this blog. "Inspired" is in quotes because although the topics of the three books meet fundamental needs in society and are well-written they are emotionally (visually) unappealing. Yet, all three books supposedly target the lay reader or general public. Two of the three have attractive covers. But as soon as the books are cracked we are inundated with dry, long, explanations that only philosophers and theologians might appreciate.  They are void of visual appeal and emotional engagement. In short there is no entertainment value. 

It is very sad and frustrating to come upon great ideas (such as these books represent) that are so poorly executed by their publishers. You must be both inspired in the creation of your works (products) and you must also inspire the products use. If you don't, your efforts and your work will expire without effect. 

DESIGN TO EMOTIONALIZE

Something needs to be said about the state of most religious products that are "designed" to educate. They don't. Well meaning intentions are not sufficient, just like prayer is no substitute for talent or effort. As a Christian, in addition to inspiration (from the Holy Spirit or otherwise), you need both talent (natural or acquired) and effort (passion plus perseverance) to accomplish something good. Prayer alone results only in religious mediocrity. The mind must partner with the body -- the spiritual and psychological must be fully engaged with the physical realm. The WHOLE person must be involved in creating the product and in using the product.  Anything less is just that -- less.

Now in religious circles (especially orthodox Catholic and Christian circles) the term "entertainment" is nearly an anathema. There is this connotation that anything that entertains is probably evil. Well, folks, get over that misconception. You need to understand what "entertainment" is really about at both the cognitive and subconscious levels. Yes, it can be mindless enjoyment or escape. But  remember this when you're thinking that, the "mindless" fun WILL BE REMEMBERED FOR A LIFETIME.

Does that give you a hint at what you may be missing as a communicator and educator of ideas? You want people to remember things (and perhaps practice those things) for a lifetime.  To do that you need to create an adrenalin rush that burns your brain's synapses in a pattern that allows later recall. Without that emotional participation of the body, your audience will never remember a thing.

A simple way of explaining that is this: The user MUST first BE INTERESTED in the product for purposes of achieving a PERSONAL GOAL. In all successful stories the protagonist must have a physical goal or the story is lost on the audience. (TMP.) That is also true of our personal stories, our lives. People without goals becomes useless if not dangerous to society.  In our publications and mass media efforts such a goal related interest must be evident to the reader on the surface of a product for a person to even consider it. But it must run much deeper for them to buy it and continually use it and not let it sit on the shelf.  Below is a slide from one of my workshops. It's the Alison Fisher Purchase Funnel. We use it in story structure to explain romantic comedies. But it was conceived to help marketers and producers understand the buyer's perspective of the purchasing process.


For many marketers just the exchange of money for product is the producer's main goal. Whether they use the product is of a lesser concern. But for religious educators the physical purchase is not nearly as important as the internal application. So, if you're selling a book that you hope will change how a person relates to their spouse, you will not be satisfied unless a changed life results. Actual acquisition of the book is only one step to your end goal. So for religious publishers the "PURCHASE" in the funnel above has a deeper meaning. "Buyer commitment" means use and application.

What is instructive about the funnel for a creator of products is that the deeper you drill down into the funnel, the more emotionally involved you need the buyer to be. And I'm suggesting that emotional involvement means "entertainment value" and that means "SENSUAL."

SENSUALIZE

"Sensual" -- ah, another anathema term in Christian publishing. Well, let me properly (not popularly) define it for you.  Human beings are fundamentally sentient beings. "Sentience" is the ability to feel or perceive. We do that through our senses. Can you name all SIX of them. Yes, humans have SIX physical senses. The more of them you employ in your products as a communicator, the better you will communicate -- especially with men who need both ears and both eyes to connect their left and right brains. (That was not a slam, it's true.)  Okay, what are the SIX senses: Seeing, Hearing, Feeling, Smelling, Tasting .... and Balancing (most of us have an inner ear that allows us to stand, sit, walk and climb.) It's important to include this kinesthetic sense (which includes not just the inner-ear but the thousands of nerve endings that control our muscles to orient our body in space) because it is that ACTIVE sense which allows us to physically participate and do the good works God calls us to. It's also a lot harder to fall asleep when you're walking, running or jumping -- although I manage to have nearly perfected it as of late.

In real life all those senses are used, which is why "experience" is the best teacher. I like movies a lot because they involve many of the senses all at once, and can come close to simulating real life. In the Catholic Mass, Communion is the ultimate communication method. It requires the use of all six senses. Books create a special challenge because they are mostly passive. (The iPad and its derivatives are changing that.) But how does a book entertain, or emotionally engage? Here is a shorthanded list of what a good book can do to emotionally engage the reader:

1. Content - Relevant, Readable, Witty
2. Visuals - Bold, Colorful, Frequent
3. Layout - Logical, Varied, Spaced
4. Typography - Structured, Variety, Characterized
5. Binding - Secure, Easy, Protective

So, with that long introduction, to further reinforce my point, below is a cross-posting from my Moral Premise Blog titled FIRST ENTERTAIN. Does this apply to you?

===========================

FIRST ENTERTAIN

There's an adage in Hollywood, and similar industries, that says: "FIRST ENTERTAIN."

Successful entertainment, to me, is defined as emotionally engaging audiences so that they're willing to buy a ticket.

For me, the term "entertain" has an emotional element and a training element. (I'm sure this is NOT the word's etymology, but humor me.) Successful entertainment always emotionally engages your audience, AND it passes onto them some true moral message usually hidden in the subtext.  (For the girl on the right that truth is "Never, ever believe your mom when she says, 'Trust me, you'll love it.'")

So, we have something that is emotional (E) and we have a training element (TRAIN). That gives us E-TRAIN. Also there is the idea that both the emotional and the training enter into the person's consciousness and become ingrained. The key word there is ENTER.

So successful entertainment ENTERS into a person EMOTIONALLY and TRAINS them about something true. First ENTERTAIN.

Okay, Okay, so TRAIN and TAIN are not the same. Let me  s t r e t c h  it for ya. TAIN rhymes with STAIN, and good entertainment leaves behind a stain.... no, no, you potty head... a stain in your brain—a memory. (Geez! I can't take you anywhere.) Another way to understand it is that ENTER-TAIN is a lot like INNER-TRAIN. That is, something is "entertaining" because it has the ability to train our memories. The reverse is also true: if we want to train our memories there must be some emotional involvement, some entertainment. Memories do not "stick" without adrenalin burning some synapses together in our brain.  


The long of this short post is that successful communication has three components. It must ENTERTAIN, and for it to do that it must be MORALLY TRUE (at a psychological, spiritual, or subliminal level), and it must EMOTIONALLY ENGAGE (it must be be a visceral simulation of life).

That is what stories do better than a thrill ride at an amusement park, and what stories do almost as good as real life experiences (life's best teacher), but with out the physical danger.

(And you can believe the little girl above would feel a lot safer at the movies. Real life does have its drawbacks, especially when your mother is C R A Z Y!)

Thursday, December 9, 2010

Atheism and Miracles: Is It Really About Evidence?

Miracle, Fluke, or Not Enough Data?
My friend, Dave Armstrong maintains a very active apologetics blog, called Biblical Evidence for Catholicism (which covers much more wide-ranging material than its title suggests). In one of his articles, Dave reports on an interesting occasion when he was the guest of 16 atheists who tried to poke holes in his Catholic thinking. I guess it was a friendly dialogue, and not a typical angry debate, as such occasions seem often to be.

[Addendum from 7-17-23: Dave has now written over 4,300 articles and 53 books: the latest of which, The Word Set in Stone: How Archaeology, Science, and History Back Up the Bible (Catholic Answers Press: March 15, 2023, 271 pages), addresses many biblical "miracles" and proposes possible and perhaps plausible natural explanations for many. On his Philosophy, Science, & Christianity web page he also has several articles about miracles]

The center of their discussion was whether or not miracles have occurred in the past or can occur.  In particular they were discussing the Resurrection of Christ. This particular group, and one person in particular (DagoodS) found it difficult to discuss the plausibility of miracles because the group defined a miracle as an event that defied or broke the laws of nature.  Dave pointed out that unless the group could get off it's "no miracles allowed" mind-set, there was no chance to have an intellectual discussion regarding the possibility of miracles. That is, the firm bias of "miracles are impossible" prevents any intellectual investigation into the possibility of the same. It's like saying, "I choose not to believe in it, therefore it doesn't exist." My anti-Catholic children will say to me, "That's not what I believe" ... as if their ability to believe or not was the criteria for reality.

The Atheists' Beef with Miracles

DagoodS put his "beef" this way. I'm editing to pull together his salient comments:
As to naturalistic presupposition [regarding miracles]…I agree that is a difficulty for the [Christian] apologist to [objectively] discuss the Resurrection. Alas, it is part of human make-up. We all have biases. As a naturalist, I am going to look for a natural  explanation. As a theist, [the Christian would look] for a supernatural explanation.

Many apologists...appear to claim the evidence (for the Resurrection) is sufficient to ... convince a naturalist. In those situations, I try to explain why the evidence is not enough. Why we have legitimate (often un-addressed) concerns regarding the evidence claimed.
If I can interpret and expand for DagoodS (he can correct me):
Producing evidence in favor of miracles is not sufficient because the atheist will have legitimate concerns about the evidence. 
Of  course this is short hand, but is it the whole argument? Because it sounds like DagoodS is shutting the door before there's even a knock on it. It sounds like this:
Any evidence presented in favor of miracles would be illegitimate because the evidence is flawed...and we don't even have to test the evidence to know it's flawed.
Such is the character of prejudice and fallacious argumentation. The fallacy has two names in material logic: (1) Ignoring the counter evidence, and (2) Denying the counter evidence. Under the color of logic the atheist claims "I don't see it, therefore it must not exist."

Ah, there is the rub...and the solution.

Miracles and the Laws of Nature
The problem atheists have with miracles should be the same problem Christians have with miracles. The common definition is fallacious: An event that breaks one or more laws of nature.  Such a definition, if not pure arrogance, is a fallacious assumption. What follows in an explanation.

Let's start with one of Dave's favorite priests, Fr. John Hardon. In his Modern Catholic Dictionary (Eternal Life Publishing, 1999) he has this definition:
MIRACLE. A sensibly perceptible effect, surpassing at least the powers of visible nature, produced by God to witness to some truth or testify to someone's sanctity.
I don't expect atheists or skeptics to accept Fr. Hardon's definition. I provide it here for Catholics to help them see the fallacious nature of their definition. To understand why the common miracle definition is wrong, let's parse Fr. Hardon's definition. Note he says, a miracle is:
  • Something that is "sensibly perceived." That is, a miracle is not a vision or a dream that one or only a few see. A miracle is something that is commonly witnessed by everyone present at the time.
  • Is an "effect" - that means it is physical, not an "affect" which refers to the psychological state of a person.
  • The event or effect surpasses our understanding of the powers of visible  nature. That is the miracle APPEARS VISIBLY to contradict the laws of nature.
  • It is produced by God (not mankind)
  • It has a higher moral purpose. It's not just eye-candy or entertainment.
The important concept in Fr. Hardon's definition that applies to the current issue, is that the miracle visually appears to break the laws of nature.

Knowledge

As physicist (in part) and a Christian (hopefully, not in part) I have never believed that miracles need to break a natural law. The concept of "breaking a natural law" is that a contradiction has occurred. Natural Laws, however, are understood to be immutable and not exist in contradiction with one another -- something cannot be both TRUE and FALSE. Science would look at an apparent contradiction in nature and call it a paradox. That is, we just don't have all the knowledge about what is happening. Until we have most of the data we might call the event a phenomenon...and theologians and people of faith might call the phenomenon a miracle.  I submit, therefore, that miracles, which happen in the natural world, are paradoxes, not contradictions.  (BTW: The term contradiction is used in logic, for propositional statements that, to our thinking, are both true and false at the same time. )

In other words, when we "SEE" a contradiction we are mistaken, it is a paradox. The laws of nature cannot be broken, but they can be misunderstood.

Worlds in Collision

My thinking about miracles is informed by Worlds in Collision, a controversial book by Immanuel Velikovsky, in part, about the Plagues of Egypt (Moses). Velikovsky hypotheses that the miracles of the plagues were actually the natural result of Earth's collision with the tail of a comet. He explains them all as paradoxes. That does not make them less miraculous.

Another example is the fictional (but logical) account of the protagonist in "A Yankee in King Arthur's Court" who knows a solar eclipse is about to occur and uses it to his advantage. But such an event seems like a miracle or magic to the less knowledgeable characters around him.

Then there are the scientific and mathematical discovers of physical dimensions beyond the space-time continuum that can be described as 3 three physical (space) dimensions (length, height, and depth) and the thing we call the dimension of time, although we can only perceive a dot along the timeline, and not a full linear dimension as we do a ruled line on a piece of paper.  We cannot directly perceive the ten dimensions of space, but String Theory suggests they exists for certain mathematical and scientific observations to be true. Take for instance the spectrum's red-shift observations of deep space objects that indicate the objects are moving away from us a tremendous speed.  That movement is not in the three dimensions of space as we perceive it, but is on the surface of a 4th-space-dimension that is ever expanding. We see the effect but we can't see the dimension.

The existence of this 4th-space-dimension easily explains how Christ can seemingly appear to walk through a wall in the Upper Room, or how the Apostles and Christ can be appear to be transported instantly from one place to another. Or how the Red Sea is apparently parted. In all of these instances the laws of the natural universe are not broken, but rather we are allowed to physically experience what is always there. It's as if I go from bright sunlight into a dark room. For a while I can see nothing, until my eyes adjust, and then I see everything that has always been there. It's not a miracle. Things do not suddenly appear out of nothing.

All such "miracles" do violate our current understanding of Newtonian three-dimensions of space and time, but they obviously don't need to violate the laws of the universe when completely understood.

Monkeys and Witchcraft

This throws a monkey wrench into the atheist's arguments about needing "legitimate" evidence to "unanswered questions." In effect the atheist is demanding (or claiming) omniscience of the universe of knowledge. He is claiming to be, ironically, God. He is either claiming to know all or is expecting God to provide all knowledge. But that is something he will never have (unless he are "lucky" enough to get to heaven). Arrogance that he is important enough to have such knowledge cuts him off from God, who demands that we trust him for what our minds are too small to understand. "Now we see through a glass darkly..." Their illogical demand to be "god-like" in terms of knowledge (either now or at sometime in the future) cuts them off from the revelations that only faith and inform them about.

Did you see the "typo?" It wasn't. That last "and" was to be a "can". (See what mistakes and knowledge can impart?) Something does not make sense (like my last sentence) until new data is provided (it's a "can")  suddenly makes sense.  All human history is filled with such examples, especially in the history of science. What mankind thought was witchcraft of the 18th century is today "modern medicine" or "medical miracles."

Thus, the atheist, by his claim of of omniscience (there IS no God), and by his demand, "I need to know all to believe,"  errors on two fronts.  If he's honest, he "knows" he is not perfect, and that he is fully capable of making a typo.

Science Assumes Order

This leads "naturally" to the role of Christian Faith, without which few scientific discoveries would have been possible. Faith is irrevocably tied to scientific discovery because science assumes there is a natural order to be discovered. That is, science has faith that the universe is ordered and is not random or chaotic.  That order fulfills a mystical purpose is the scientist's assumption. That supposition allows science to use syllogisms to construct hypotheses, and then use logic to test them. The correct syllogisms lead to a constructive universe, not a destructive one. Without faith in a higher entity that designed and maintains the order, there is no purpose of the universe, and no hypotheses that can be tested.

Atheists are Logical Cowards

But we are sidetracked by all this talk of the need for evidence. What is really going on is this: Atheists hide behind the color of logic and evidence for fear of confronting the moral code of a just and gracious God. Atheism is a cowardly way to avoid natural law -- the natural moral code -- of the Creator. It's really not about evidence. Thus, the atheist isn't saying, "There are no miracles." or "There is no god," as if he was omniscient on that point. But he can say, and he has full right to it:  "There is no God -- Whom I will obey." Ah! Now that's evidence that makes logical sense.

Other References

C.S. Lewis is his book Miracles uses an argument similar to this, but different enough to be interesting. His premise is that due to humanity's lack of knowledge about the universe, natural laws should be perceived as laws about the way mater and time should normally interact, given our limited perspective of reality. But once new information or some new stimuli is put into the system of nature, natural law takes over and different (unnatural or supernatural) consequences result. Science is nothing more than the observation of nature and the construction of laws about what is observed. So, say we have a tank of fish, and we study them in this isolated situation and make up rules about their behavior. But one day we see something that is not "natural" in the fishes's world. That unnatural behavior, or supernatural behavior, may be the consequence of a new input to the system, and, after that new input, natural law takes over and we see the natural consequence. Thus, when Mary is impregnated by the Holy Spirit we have a new input into a natural environment...and Mary gives birth, according to natural law, nine months later.

Lewis makes the point I do above. No natural law is ever broken. Natural laws respond consistently to stimuli around them. What we see, which we call a miracle, is actually just a response of nature to a stimuli we have never seen before. 

Monday, December 6, 2010

The Books Are IN

I can't write much, there's too much to do. I have over a hundred books to ship tomorrow -- pre-orders for what finally arrived today. My video editing salon smells like a printing plant. Although packed in 139 boxes the 2,500 copies of WHAT CATHOLICS REALLY BELIEVE are still drying, after a 6 week journey by rickshaw, container ship, rail and truck -- from Malaysia to Michigan.  I conceived this book over three years ago, and I'm thrilled with how it came out. Thanks to Dr. Ray for helping it become a reality. It's the best looking and most readable educational book about Catholicism available anywhere. You bet I'm biased. See our inside the book and our specials HERE. Please tell your priests and religious education directors that we offer 50-60% discounts for quantity purchases for students. We ship around the world. Tomorrow I have orders going out to Australia, the UK, and San Juan, and there are already three copies in South Africa.


First Skid Off the Overseas-Transport Truck
 


Boxes stacked in the video edit salon -- warehouse is full.

WCRB Ready for Fulfillment